Legislature(1997 - 1998)
02/10/1998 01:50 PM House FIN
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 53 "An Act relating to the authority of the Department of Corrections to contract for facilities for the confinement and care of prisoners, and annulling a regulation of the Department of Corrections that limits the purposes for which an agreement with a private agency may be entered into; authorizing an agreement by which the Department of Corrections may, for the benefit of the state, enter into one lease of, or similar agreement to use, space within a correctional facility that is operated by a private contractor, and setting conditions on the operation of the correctional facility affected by the lease or use agreement; and giving notice of and approving a lease-purchase agreement or similar use-purchase agreement for the design, construction, and operation of a correctional facility, and setting conditions and limitations on the facility's design, construction, and operation." MARGARET PUGH, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS provided members with a handout titled, What is the Problem? (Copy on file). She observed that there are 3,239 inmates in Alaskan correctional facilities. The emergency capacity of the Department of Corrections is 2,691 inmates. The Department is over capacity by 548 inmates. The state of Alaska has been ordered by the Court to find a way to reduce its prison population to 2,691 by May 1, 1998. Commissioner Pugh reviewed the handout: What Is the Problem? * Alaska's prison's and jails are severely overcrowded; * There is no space for new criminals; * Projections show system will grow by 200 prisoners each year; * The State is under Court Order to decrease overcrowding; * The State is being assessed fines for overcrowding; and * No legislative action has been taken. What Has Been Done? * In 1995, the Department sent over 200 prisoners out of State; * In 1996, "Protecting the People" was introduced by the Criminal Justice Cabinet; The Governor introduced the G.O. Bond bill to implement "Protecting the People"; Legislation to build a private prison in Anchorage was discussed ; and An initiative was placed on the ballot to block the building of a private prison in Anchorage. * In 1997, the Criminal Justice Cabinet offered to work with the Legislature; The Legislature discussed issues and introduced a variety of bills, but no legislation passed; and A ballot measure passed effectively blocking construction of a prison in South Anchorage. * In 1998, the Governor introduced a bill for Phase I of a statewide expansion. What must we do right away? Givens: * To do "nothing" is unacceptable; * The Governor will not commute sentences; and * The State needs to move over 500 prisoners by May 1. Options: * We can use more CRC beds for low risk offenders; * We can send more dangerous prisoners out-of-state; and * We can place non-dangerous misdemeanants in tents or other temporary structures on prison grounds surrounded by a secure fence. What are our long-term choices? * The legislature can review, amend, and adopt the Governor's statewide expansion plan (HB 368, SB 267). * The legislature can expand Spring Creek, replace Sixth Avenue Jail, expand the state prison at Palmer, and build a private prison at Palmer (SB 179). As proposed, this does not meet DOC principles. * The legislature can authorize the conversion of Ft. Greely at Delta Junction into a medium-security prison for 800 prisoners (HB 53). As proposed, this does not meet DOC principles. In response to a question by Co-Chair Hanley, Commissioner Pugh reviewed the Department of Corrections principles. To warrant serious consideration, any prison or jail expansion proposal must be: - Safe; - Statewide (comprehensive and meets regional needs); - Consistent with best correctional practices; - Involve community participation (government to government); and - Cost effective. Co-Chair Hanley observed that HB 53 does not meet the Administration's statewide comprehensive concern. Commissioner Pugh agreed and added that Bethel is the most chronically overcrowded correctional facility. Co-Chair Hanley asked the total per diem cost to implement the Governor's plan, including capital and operating expenses. He observed that the Palmer facility expansion would cost $16.5 million dollars for 221 beds. He clarified that the total per diem amount should include construction costs amortized over 20 years. Co-Chair Therriault stressed that the Legislature needs the Department of Corrections to provide it with numbers. Commissioner Pugh stated that she would complete the math to the best ability of the Department. She noted that she has questions about the cost of implementing HB 53. She questioned what the $70 dollar a day rate includes. The Department of Corrections' $100 dollar per diem cost includes; total operations at an institutional site, institutional programs, correctional industries, transportation, inmate health care, building and equipment depreciation, capital replacements and all administrative and support costs. The Arizona contract does not include inmate health care, major medical, transportation or inmate gratuities. She asked how many years the $70 dollar a day rate would hold. She questioned what would happen if the contractor defaults. She asked what is the total price of converting and operating Fort Greely as a medium security prison. In response to a question by Representative Martin, Commissioner Pugh stated that the prison and jail populations have out stripped the growth in state population. Crime is down, but arrests are up. She stated that "people are not getting out." She quoted a previous commissioner of the department as saying that the "stopper is in the bathtub, and the water is on." She added that either a bigger bathtub has to be built or the facet has to be turned off. She maintained that the bathtub is over flowing. Representative Martin asked if a Fort Greely facility would ease the problem. Commissioner Pugh stressed that she cares about what happens to the people of Delta Junction. She maintained that she would like to work with the Legislature, but added that she has concerns and questions regarding the proposal. Co-Chair Therriault noted that the Cleary moderator stated that the Governor's plan is not acceptable. He observed that the Governor's plan has not been established to be the most cost effective. Representative Kelly asked if the $70 dollar a day rate compares with the Department's $100 dollar a day cost. He questioned if the Delta project would take the pressure off. Commissioner Pugh acknowledged that the Fort Greely facility would take pressure off. Representative Kelly observed that the proposal would alleviate part of the prison problem without putting an additional burden on the state's capital appropriations. He asked Commissioner Pugh's to outline her objections to HB 53. Commissioner Pugh stated that she does not have a good feel for the financing package and the total cost of the legislation. She did not know if the total cost of the facility and operations could be covered at $70 dollars a day. Representative Kelly asked if she would be supportive if the cost of the facility and operations could be covered for $70 dollars a day. Commissioner Pugh felt that $70 dollars a day would be low if all the factors were taken into account. She acknowledge that her level of comfort would be increased if it can be demonstrated that $70 dollars a day would cover all the costs. Commissioner Pugh provided members with a facility count in response to questions from Co-Chair Hanley during a previous meeting (copy on file). Co-Chair Hanley clarified that his request was in response to the insinuation that there would not be enough medium security prisoners to fill 800 beds. He noted that the handout does not show security levels. Commissioner Pugh clarified that most prisoners do fall in the medium custody level. Co-Chair Hanley noted that projections show that the state correctional facilities would be over capacity by 1,300 prisoners. Commissioner Pugh noted that the State paid for the full cost of halfway houses even when they were not full. Contracts with halfway houses are now on a per diem basis. Prisoners at Palmer, Wildwood and in Arizona are medium security inmates. Representative Davies asked what kind of health care facilities are in Delta Junction, who would be called in case of a riot and are there additional costs for fire safety. Commissioner Pugh noted that standards established by the American Corrections Association state that a prison should be located no farther than 50 miles from a major city of 10,000. This standard was established to assure proximity to emergency services. She stressed that the problems regarding HB 53 are not insurmountable. She noted that issues such as response to fires or riots would need to be addressed. Transportation in case of an emergency is also an issue. She noted that prisoners could be screened for medical concerns. She observed that there is a good runway at Fort Greely, but added that it is more expensive to airlift a person. Representative Davies asked Commissioner Pugh to attach a cost to these issues. She stressed that it will be difficult to get a true "apples to apples cost." In response to a question by Representative Mulder, Commissioner Pugh noted that the department is working on a Request for Proposal (RFP) for out-of-state medium security beds. The Arizona contract expires on June 30, 1998. The RFP would be for up to 600 beds. Representative Mulder pointed out that 600 beds are needed today. The Fort Greely facility would not come on line for a couple of years. Commissioner Pugh acknowledged that it is a reasonable expectation that 800 beds will be necessary. In response to a question by Representative Davis, Commissioner Pugh clarified that security levels relate to buildings and custody levels relate to the degree of supervision. Each inmate has a custody and security level. There are five custody levels: maximum, closed, medium, minimum and community. The majority of inmates are in medium custody. Representative Davies pointed out that if prisoners for out- of-state or rural facilities are screened for pre-existing medical conditions and other needs than prisoners in facilities near town would require more expensive care. Co-Chair Therriault pointed out that the Legislature trusts the Department to write a contract for out-of-state inmates. He added that the Legislature would trust the Department to write a contract to implement HB 53 if it is enacted. Commissioner Pugh clarified that the out-of-state contract will go out to bid as an RFP. She reiterated that she would appreciate guidance. (Tape Change, HFC 98 - 25, Side 2) MARGOT KNUTH, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LAW pointed out that many of the prisoners in overcrowded institutions cannot be moved since they are pretrial prisoners or serving short sentences. She pointed out that regional facilities would need to be expanded. HB 53 was HELD in Committee for further consideration.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|